The Physics of Professor Splash’s Jump into 1 foot of water

November 14th, 2008 | Tags: , , ,

Here is a video of a guy jumping 35 feet into a pool of water only 1 foot deep.

UPDATE: Apparently, that video went away. Here is another version.

How does this work?

I don’t think I even need to do a video analysis of this motion, all the important info is given. I will assume that air resistance did not play a signficant role (and that is a good assumption – or good enough – see this for example: motion of a falling tennis ball). So, here is the situation. Part 1: guy falls 35 feet 5 inches (10.8 meters).

Screenshot 16sd

For this part of the motion, it will be easiest to use the Work-Energy theorem to determine his velocity RIGHT before hitting the water. (note that I am assuming the 10.8 meters is the distance to the surface of the water, but really it doesn’t matter much). The work-energy theorem states:

workenergy

In this example, I will assume just the person as the system. This means that the only change in energy will be the change in his kinetic energy and the gravitational force will do work. The two things to start with are the gravitational force (close to the surface of the Earth):

fgrav

Here g is the gravitational field (9.8 N/kg) pointing down. And kinetic energy:

ke

When calculating the work done by gravity, the gravitational force and the displacement are both down. This means that the work done by gravity will be a positive quantity. This gives:

workenergy3

Putting in some numbers, I get:

Screenshot 14

for the speed of the guy right BEFORE he hits the water. Now I can apply the same idea when he hits the water. The only difference is this time he starts at the above speed and ends at rest – also there is another force acting on him, the water.

forces1234

I can then use this to find the force the water exerts on him:

fwater

This would be great, but it turns out that a better measure of what a person can handle is in terms of the acceleration. So, solving for the acceleration of the person:

avgaccel

Now to get this in terms of “g’s”, where 1 “g” is 9.8 m/s2. This would give an acceleration of 35.4 g’s. Is this ok? Well, instead of going out and taking human g-force tolerance data, I will use NASA’s data as listed on wikipedia. This says a human can take 35 g’s “eyeballs in” if it is for less than 0.01 minutes. (eyeballs in means the acceleration is in the opposite direction that your eyes look) So, how long was this guy accelerating? If I assume a constant acceleration, I can use the definition of average velocity where his average velocity while stopping would be 7.275 m/s.

dtsdf

So, it looks like this is within the range of what NASA recommends. No wonder this guy is a professor, his jump is NASA-approved.

  1. agm
    November 15th, 2008 at 08:16
    Reply | Quote | #1

    An admirer of Henri LaMothe then?

  2. November 16th, 2008 at 17:50
    Reply | Quote | #2

    That’s neat… but I’m still bothered by something…

    Why should the water act on him with that force? Why doesn’t the water quickly displace itself and leave the rest of the pushing for the hard ground to do? (I guess I’m puzzled by the “fine tuning” element… if you see what I mean).

  3. Alex M
    November 18th, 2008 at 06:50
    Reply | Quote | #3

    So the video seems to have been removed, but you’re telling me that an educated man willingly belly-flopped into a 0.305m deep pool of water from a height of 10.8m? Shouldn’t he have been in incredible pain afterward?

  4. rhett
    November 18th, 2008 at 15:56
    Reply | Quote | #4

    @Alex,

    Sorry about the video. I found another version. This guy is all over the internet. If this video disappears also, just search for “professor splash”. Also, I am sure he was in pain. Such is the price of fame.

  5. rhett
    November 18th, 2008 at 15:59
    Reply | Quote | #5

    @Jasper,

    If you want, you can think of the water as a whole bunch of water particle. When the guy hits the water, he is having a collision with them so that they DO move. Also, when the water moves it collides with other water. The net result can be modeled as some force.

  6. Roy
    January 8th, 2009 at 21:57
    Reply | Quote | #6

    You are missing an important fact: The pool with 1 ft. of water is not on solid ground. It is on a several feet thick cushion. Therefore, a great deal of the force is absorbed by the cushion and not the water.

  7. Aza
    November 28th, 2009 at 14:36
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Roy, If you read the previous posts you will see that the video currently up is NOT the original video from “Time Warp” on Discovery Chan, the original video has him jumping into the very same kiddy pool with 1ft of water but over solid concrete not a soft cushion. This video is only a replacement video for the one that got taken down.

Comments are closed.